Biostar H61MLC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardBiostar H61MLC  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '19 at 16:04
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-2100-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
43.4% Average
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 155
54% 116 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 207
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 208
14% 208 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 995 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.2
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 82.7
Reflection 83
Parallax 108
22% 91.3 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 87.5
20% 72.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 22%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 88 77 90 103 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 109
Write 38.9
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 87.5
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
380GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 130 130 129 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 139
Write 136
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 129
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 103%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
234GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 48 48 49 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 34.6
Write 31.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 47.9
26% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 50%
hp v165w 4GB
3GB free, PID 5307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.4 5 5.4 5.4 5.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.2
10% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H61MLC Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar H61MLC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia RTX 2060 $324Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback