| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160511 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 06 '19 at 09:16 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | VNM-User |
| Background CPU | 45% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
54.6%
Above average
|
71% 127 Pts
|
27% 204 Pts
|
12% 198 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
48.4%
Average
|
49% 66.4 fps
|
47% 57.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 97 100 102 97 82 MB/s
|
21.6%
Poor
|
22% 99 MB/s
|
33% 9.2 MB/s
| |
|
Colorful SL300 120GB
108GB free
Firmware: S0103C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 353 353 357 358 351 MB/s
|
70.6%
Very good
|
75% 333 MB/s
|
92% 30.4 MB/s
|
67% 132 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3160212SCE 160GB
278GB free
Firmware: 3.ACF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
39% 52.7 MB/s
|
140% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C17 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
56.6%
Above average
|
56% 19.6 GB/s
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
44% 92.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,423 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $84Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 215x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 189x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 168x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 176x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 171x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 109x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $171 |