Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory78GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 78GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06FW8P
Memory73 GB free of 78 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '19 at 14:37
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 619
58% 484 Pts
64-Core 1,307
81% 1,307 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000
Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.2GB
CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.2GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 14.3
11% 15.6 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 17.4
13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$71
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 127 123 126 127 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 133
Write 128
Mixed 129
SusWrite 126
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 29.5
95% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 93
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 83.6
65% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 127%
Biwin SSD 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 6B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 125 125 125 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.1% Below average
Read 133
Write 126
Mixed 123
SusWrite 110
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 16.5
67% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 77.3
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 22.6
34% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 84%
WD Re 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1M01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 107 107 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 111
Write 107
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 107
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 122 123 122 123 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 106
Write 93.6
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 122
64% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 117 117 118 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 85
Write 134
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 121
65% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.5
190% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
369GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 92 91 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 84.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 89.3
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 2048, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 20.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback