TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Qosmio X75-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory16.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '19 at 16:31
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 85
2-Core 185
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 465
50% 395 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 75.1%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5057
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 6.56
3% 5.59 fps
MRender 9.57
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.91
6% 6.62 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.85%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 256GB-$29
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X412
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 176 172 195 190 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57% Above average
Read 235
Write 225
Mixed 174
SusWrite 182
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 26.1
90% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 176
137% 188 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 57%
 Great: 99%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
247GB free
Firmware: GH2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 88 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 92.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 86.7
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 55.9%
 Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-073.A00G Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 99U5428-073.A00G Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.1% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.2
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 19.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 54.1%
 Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel  $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples72x
Core i7-4910MQIntel  $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples3x
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples1x
GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples47x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples30x
SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba  $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples29x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples3x
M4 256GBCrucial  $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples2x
RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,045 samples15x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,054 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $376
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback