QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory23.5 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2210 x 1380 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 23:53
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 142
2-Core 286
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 823
86% 689 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 50.7
44% 55.6 fps
MRender 77.3
Gravity 52.8
Splatting 70.6
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 680GB
564GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 440 423 440 283 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.5% Excellent
Read 568
Write 448
Mixed 498
SusWrite 341
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 23.6
79% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 226
181% 262 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 28GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 12288 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 30.3
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 28.5
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 100%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback