Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1,642 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 71 2-Core 142 58% 96.5 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 496 47% 390 Pts	64-Core 1,326 82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.33 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	22.2% Poor	Lighting 27.1 Reflection 26 Parallax 21.8 22% 25 fps	MRender 26.6 Gravity 28.1 Splatting 27.5 22% 27.4 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM768E 751GB 163 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0A1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 314 329 288 234 311 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 376 Write 345 Mixed 181 SusWrite 292 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 12.8 55% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 48.5 DQ Mixed 80.1 70% 109 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 72%
Hitachi HUA72202 2TB 449 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 438GB free Firmware: A3NH SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 102 101 101 103 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 104 Write 108 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 102 70% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 71%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB 3,447 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 931GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 30 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 29.9 23% 31.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 7.6 1,282% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 Samsung M393B5270DH0-YK0 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 Samsung M393B5270DH0-YK0 Samsung M393B5270DH0-YK0 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 Samsung M393B5270DH0-YK0 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 Samsung M393B... 96GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	76.7% Very good	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 28.5 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16