Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM-VGS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '19 at 03:25
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 129
58% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 399
37% 309 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 38.2
32% 36.5 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 37.3
32% 38.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 159 174 61 59 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 212
Write 191
Mixed 188
SusWrite 97.9
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 10 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 92%
Drevo X1 SSD 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: Q083
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 114 120 120 123 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.9% Average
Read 241
Write 206
Mixed 200
SusWrite 110
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 13.6
88% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 63
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 19.7
35% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 88%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
13GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 114 120 120 123 112 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.8% Below average
Read 202
Write 106
Mixed 149
SusWrite 110
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 16.8
73% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 38.1
DQ Write 49
DQ Mixed 34.1
28% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 85%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 160GB
29GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.9 8.9 8.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 25.2
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 8.7
26% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 34%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
53GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.2 5.1 5.3 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Read 23.1
Write 7.2
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 5.5
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 30%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
4GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 17 17 15 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 17.7
Write 9.8
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 15.7
18% 14 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.6
146% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 18%
WDC WD10 EFRX-68FYTN0 1TB
82GB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.6 7.6 7.8 7.9 8.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 25.1
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 7.9
27% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
958GB free, PID 8561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.9 1 1 1 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 24.4
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 2.5
25% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 55%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
27GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.9 8.9 8.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
9.18% Terrible
Read 26.1
Write 24
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 8.7
20% 16 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
81% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.18%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 CT102464BA1339.M16 16GB
333, 333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback