Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1759

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE70 2QD
MotherboardMSI MS-1759  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime16.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '19 at 21:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 186
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 427
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
MSI(1462 1109) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3064
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 15.9
15% 15.9 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 13.4
14% 17 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SMS100S3128GD 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 65 33 134 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42% Average
Read 329
Write 95.5
Mixed 192
SusWrite 50.7
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 12
60% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 63.2
80% 139 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 74%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
670GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 120 124 125 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 126
Write 124
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 123
72% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1759 Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1759

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback