Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 14% (255th of 713)

Based on 38,813 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 139A Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GTX 950M averaged 86.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 18.1fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 18.9fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 950M is just 4.87%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 950M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 16.7fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 16.3fps

Average Bench

(Based on 38,813 samples)
Min Avg Max
13.3 Lighting 18.1 21
12.6 Reflection 16.7 23.6
13.4 Parallax 16.3 18
14.7% 17 fps
Min Avg Max
10.6 MRender 14.8 20.4
15 Gravity 18.9 21.7
0.2 Splatting 12.9 15.6
12.4% 15.5 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 80A9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7219
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 17.4
17% 18.2 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 21
Splatting 15.2
13% 15.8 fps
Asus(1043 1A8D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.6109
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 17.5
17% 18.2 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 15.4
13% 16.1 fps
Asus(1043 10A0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.6109
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 17.3
16% 17.8 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 15.2
13% 16.1 fps
Asus(1043 1ACD) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.5612
Lighting 20
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 18.5
16% 20.2 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 15.2
13% 15.8 fps
HP(103C 80A9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7219
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 17.3
16% 20.2 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 14.9
13% 15.4 fps
Asus(1043 178D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.6109
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 19.6
Parallax 14
14% 17 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 15.6
13% 16.2 fps
Acer(1025 108F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 15.8
13% 14.9 fps
MRender 18.8
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 11.8
12% 15.7 fps
Asus(1043 1510) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.6109
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 15.7
14% 15.2 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 17.3
Splatting 0
9% 12.3 fps
Asus(1043 1A8D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4601
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 16.3
7% 12.1 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 15.2
13% 15.4 fps
38,813 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,447,424 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 38,813 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Asus(1043 1130) 8% 13% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 380B) 8% 15% ± 2%
Asus(1043 178D) 8% 14% ± 2%
Asus(1043 1060) 5% 13% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 505C) 4% 12% ± 2%
Asus(1043 1D1D) 3% 14% ± 1%
Asus(1043 1A8D) 3% 14% ± 2%
HP(103C 80A9) 3% 15% ± 1%
Asus(1043 1C9D) 3% 15% ± 2%
Acer(1025 108F) 3% 13% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1094) 3% 13% ± 2%
Asus(1043 10A0) 3% 15% ± 1%
Asus(1043 18A0) 2% 13% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1033) 2% 15% ± 1%
Acer(1025 111A) 2% 13% ± 0%
MSI(1462 115A) 2% 13% ± 2%
Asus(1043 177D) 2% 15% ± 1%
Asus(1043 129E) 2% 13% ± 1%
MSI(1462 1190) 1% 15% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 5500) 1% 13% ± 0%
Acer(1025 1037) 1% 15% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86CE) 1% 15% ± 1%
HP(103C 816B) 1% 14% ± 3%
Device(1B0A 2281) 1% 15% ± 1%
Asus(1043 241A) 1% 14% ± 2%
Asus(1043 17BD) 1% 12% ± 3%
HP(103C 80EE) 1% 14% ± 3%
HP(103C 8257) 1% 14% ± 1%
Asus(1043 11CD) 1% 16% ± 1%
HP(103C 8421) 1% 13% ± 0%
Asus(1043 17B0) 1% 13% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 6508) 1% 14% ± 1%
Toshiba(1179 F842) 1% 14% ± 1%
Device(1B0A 22CD) 1% 15% ± 1%
Device(1B0A 2303) 1% 15% ± 1%
MSI(1462 114D) 1% 14% ± 2%
Clevo(1558 6709) 1% 13% ± 1%
Asus(1043 1510) 1% 13% ± 0%
Asus(1043 185D) 1% 15% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 3802) 1% 16% ± 0%
MSI(1462 114C) 1% 14% ± 3%
Asus(1043 14E0) 1% 12% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 650C) 1% 13% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 6509) 1% 13% ± 1%
MSI(1462 1102) 1% 13% ± 0%
MSI(1462 115B) 1% 12% ± 2%
Toshiba(1179 F84A) 1% 15% ± 1%
HP(103C 80E5) 1% 15% ± 0%
HP(103C 820D) 1% 14% ± 0%
HP(103C 8155) 1% 15% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GTX 950M Builds (Compare 1,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35

Popular GTX 950M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor

2 months ago.

Not good but you can play Minecraft


Poor

7 months ago.

Best graphic card I love this graphic card for laptop I am playing my games at 50 to 60 fps like gta 5 fortnit


Good

3 months ago.

it's good for some games like minecraft,cs:go


Good

3 months ago.

Very Good gpu Casual and standard Gaming


Poor

2 years ago.

works well for league of legends. it's ok for wow but I wouldnt recommand it for shadowlands


Excellent

1 month ago.

Okay for casual gaming/esport titles. But this is not okay for lastest AAA games since u can only play (mostly) at 720p resoultion and lower


Poor

9 months ago.

i have one in my laptop and the fps is lower then low


Good

4 years ago.

I have an ASUS GL552JX since 2015. It has the 950m 2GB and an i7 4720hq. 1TB 5400 rpm. 16 GB of 1600Mhz ram. Takes 10 minutes to boot and 3 more to be usable. The screen is ok. GTA V ~50 fps on normal 1080p but takes like 5 minutes to load. World of Warships ~40 fps on almost all ultra. CSGO and Valorant over 60 but it doesn't matter since the screen is 60Hz. Minecraft over 60 in most cases and ~35 to 40 with mild shaders. Garry's Mod is ok until you get in either a big map like gm_borealis or gm_fork. Having too many addons takes the load time to about 5 min. Escape from Tarkov ~25 fps and lower so it's unplayable even at lower resolutions. Warzone is unplayable. Destiny 2 ~40 fps on 900p and low, very playable anyway. The Division 2 ~37 fps on low and it's playable for the most part, I actually played a lot so I can't complain. GTA IV ~45 fps on normal. Fall guys goes ok but not on max settings. War Thunder and Warframe were playable as far as I remember. Planetside 2 became a mess once you got into a big fight but could it was rather enjoyable. Heroes and Generals is playable. PAYDAY 2 somehow is not. Unturned is playable. CAD is relatively ok but takes a good 4 min to start. Everytime I reload a page in google sound stutters but I guess it won't die for the next 4 months. It's been a good ride, it took almost everything I threw at it, it thermal-throttled once but I cleaned it and it was ok after. It turns off whenever I make pressure on the right side of the mousepad, though I have to say that it has taken some hits from me in the past years, but not now, and even putting my phone there turns it off. WASD keys are almost about to come out. Battery died a good half a year ago. It turns off randomly every few days, and everytime I'm scared it might be the last. It's time for a desktop, 3070 super and Ryzen 7 whatever model AMD comes with in october 2020.


Excellent

4 years ago.

i use this and its very good. 6/5


Excellent

10 months ago.

A good card its done me well, cant really play newer games but I blame my cpu for that too


Poor

4 months ago.

Well for everyday use it is nice.GTA5 at v.high and full hd i hade a decent experience with 30fps. I use it mainly for my video project because i have an i7 7700hq. But you can expect descent results like ghos recon wildlands v.high at full hd i got a full 27 fps and thats nice for a budget gpu. i lowered the resolution to 768p and got 32fps average and it was a good experince.


Poor

2 years ago.

It's fine for most games but sometimes not really.... I have no since upgraded and have a better PC.


Average

4 years ago.

Good 2 years with a laptop with this GTX 950M DDR3 4GB: GTA V: Medium-High 30fps. BeamNG: Low 20-60fps (depends on how much cars you have and on which map you are). Minecraft Java/Windows 10: 30-100fps High Optifine/40-60fps High. PC Building Simulator: Stuttering 60fps with the "Fps Boost Mod by Sceef" Fantastic. Video editing (Vegas Pro 17), make sure to drop the quality to Draft (Full) and you will be fine, lower the FPS, MP4 videos can lag sometimes, the rest is fine. Cinema 4D works and rendering time is average on Full HD. It's been a good 2 years, time to build a desktop, and use this as my second laptop, 950M --- GTX 960.


Your
opinion?
713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback