TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

GTX 950M

Average Bench: 15% (192nd of 652)

Based on 34,534 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 139A Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
Poor: 11%Average: 15% Great: 17%

Popular builds with this GPU

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GTX 950M averaged 84.9% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 18.6fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 19.3fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 950M is just 5.74%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 950M performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 17.2fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 16.6fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 34,534 samples)
Rank 19215%
Min Avg Max
13.9 Lighting 18.6 21.6
13.8 Reflection 17.2 24
13.6 Parallax 16.6 18.5
15% 17.5 fps
Min Avg Max
11.1 MRender 15 20.7
15.4 Gravity 19.3 22.4
0.2 Splatting 12.9 15.8
15% 15.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 80A9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6109
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 24.2
Parallax 17.8
17% 21.2 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 15.7
16% 16.3 fps
Asus(1043 86CE) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 17
Parallax 17.8
17% 18.7 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 15.8
16% 16.2 fps
Asus(1043 1060) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6109
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 16.3
14% 15.9 fps
MRender 20.2
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 12.9
15% 17 fps
Asus(1043 17BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 17
Parallax 18.1
12% 16.6 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 15.6
17% 16.9 fps
Asus(1043 1060) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 14.6
13% 16.1 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 13
15% 17.3 fps
Asus(1043 1060) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 6.7
14% 10 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 0.3
6% 3.93 fps
HP(103C 8155) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5241
7.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 17
Parallax 17.7
0% 11.6 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 15.7
16% 16.2 fps
34,534 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 38,538,743 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 34,534 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
Asus(1043 1130) 11% 14% ± 1%
Asus(1043 178D) 9% 16% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 380B) 8% 16% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1094) 5% 14% ± 1%
Acer(1025 108F) 4% 14% ± 1%
Asus(1043 1060) 4% 14% ± 1%
HP(103C 80A9) 4% 16% ± 2%
Asus(1043 1D1D) 3% 15% ± 2%
Asus(1043 1A8D) 3% 16% ± 1%
Device(1B0A 22CD) 2% 15% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86CE) 2% 16% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1033) 2% 16% ± 3%
MSI(1462 1190) 2% 16% ± 2%
HP(103C 8257) 2% 14% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 2281) 2% 16% ± 1%
HP(103C 8421) 2% 13% ± 2%
Asus(1043 18A0) 2% 14% ± 1%
HP(103C 816B) 2% 17% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 505C) 2% 13% ± 2%
MSI(1462 115A) 2% 14% ± 0%
Asus(1043 241A) 1% 15% ± 2%
Asus(1043 1C9D) 1% 16% ± 2%
Asus(1043 177D) 1% 15% ± 2%
Clevo(1558 5500) 1% 14% ± 0%
Asus(1043 10A0) 1% 17% ± 0%
HP(103C 80E5) 1% 15% ± 2%
Asus(1043 1ACD) 1% 15% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 670C) 1% 13% ± 2%
HP(103C 80EE) 1% 16% ± 0%
Acer(1025 091D) 1% 16% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3802) 1% 17% ± 0%
MSI(1462 114C) 1% 15% ± 4%
Acer(1025 103A) 1% 12% ± 3%
MSI(1462 115B) 1% 13% ± 2%
HP(103C 820D) 1% 14% ± 0%
Asus(1043 11CD) 1% 17% ± 1%
Asus(1043 129E) 1% 12% ± 2%
Clevo(1558 6508) 0% 16% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1037) 0% 14% ± 4%
Acer(1025 111A) 0% 14% ± 0%
Asus(1043 17BD) 0% 16% ± 2%
Asus(1043 17B0) 0% 14% ± 0%
Asus(1043 1510) 0% 14% ± 0%
HP(103C 80DE) 0% 17% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 F84A) 0% 17% ± 0%
Toshiba(1179 F842) 0% 14% ± 3%
Asus(1043 1260) 0% 14% ± 0%
Asus(1043 185D) 0% 17% ± 0%
Asus(1043 14E0) 0% 14% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 6709) 0% 14% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GTX 950M Builds (Compare 1,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550VX

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 66%, 277,952 samples1,487x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 64%, 44,855 samples288x
GPU
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 15%, 34,534 samples684x
SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung  $40Bench 105%, 211,959 samples64x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $57Bench 108%, 504,559 samples61x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 46%, 53,171 samples44x
RAM
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 28,015 samples281x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 29%, 3,346 samples256x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 65%, 11,778 samples161x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $40

Popular GTX 950M systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
7,358

Good (edit your comment) Add link

10 days ago.

Runs a couple games at ultra settings but most modern games runs good at very low, For example Rocket League on Low runs at 45 fps and for higher settings just subtract 5. Still a very decent card for light gamers.

FRA-User
Avatar level
3,691

Poor

13 days ago.

works well for league of legends. it's ok for wow but I wouldnt recommand it for shadowlands

NLD-User
Avatar level
2,692

Excellent

1 month ago.

i have one in my laptop and the fps is lower then low

CHL-User
Avatar level
2,204

Good

4 months ago.

I have an ASUS GL552JX since 2015. It has the 950m 2GB and an i7 4720hq. 1TB 5400 rpm. 16 GB of 1600Mhz ram. Takes 10 minutes to boot and 3 more to be usable. The screen is ok. GTA V ~50 fps on normal 1080p but takes like 5 minutes to load. World of Warships ~40 fps on almost all ultra. CSGO and Valorant over 60 but it doesn't matter since the screen is 60Hz. Minecraft over 60 in most cases and ~35 to 40 with mild shaders. Garry's Mod is ok until you get in either a big map like gm_borealis or gm_fork. Having too many addons takes the load time to about 5 min. Escape from Tarkov ~25 fps and lower so it's unplayable even at lower resolutions. Warzone is unplayable. Destiny 2 ~40 fps on 900p and low, very playable anyway. The Division 2 ~37 fps on low and it's playable for the most part, I actually played a lot so I can't complain. GTA IV ~45 fps on normal. Fall guys goes ok but not on max settings. War Thunder and Warframe were playable as far as I remember. Planetside 2 became a mess once you got into a big fight but could it was rather enjoyable. Heroes and Generals is playable. PAYDAY 2 somehow is not. Unturned is playable. CAD is relatively ok but takes a good 4 min to start. Everytime I reload a page in google sound stutters but I guess it won't die for the next 4 months. It's been a good ride, it took almost everything I threw at it, it thermal-throttled once but I cleaned it and it was ok after. It turns off whenever I make pressure on the right side of the mousepad, though I have to say that it has taken some hits from me in the past years, but not now, and even putting my phone there turns it off. WASD keys are almost about to come out. Battery died a good half a year ago. It turns off randomly every few days, and everytime I'm scared it might be the last. It's time for a desktop, 3070 super and Ryzen 7 whatever model AMD comes with in october 2020.

FIN-User
Avatar level
2,018

Excellent

6 months ago.

i use this and its very good. 6/5

TUN-User
Avatar level
924

Good

12 months ago.

Well for everyday use it is nice.GTA5 at v.high and full hd i hade a decent experience with 30fps. I use it mainly for my video project because i have an i7 7700hq. But you can expect descent results like ghos recon wildlands v.high at full hd i got a full 27 fps and thats nice for a budget gpu. i lowered the resolution to 768p and got 32fps average and it was a good experince.

Fuckit
Avatar level
6

Average

4 months ago.

It's fine for most games but sometimes not really....

PandaTech
Avatar level
2

Average

8 months ago.

Good 2 years with a laptop with this GTX 950M DDR3 4GB: GTA V: Medium-High 30fps. BeamNG: Low 20-60fps (depends on how much cars you have and on which map you are). Minecraft Java/Windows 10: 30-100fps High Optifine/40-60fps High. PC Building Simulator: Stuttering 60fps with the "Fps Boost Mod by Sceef" Fantastic. Video editing (Vegas Pro 17), make sure to drop the quality to Draft (Full) and you will be fine, lower the FPS, MP4 videos can lag sometimes, the rest is fine. Cinema 4D works and rendering time is average on Full HD. It's been a good 2 years, time to build a desktop, and use this as my second laptop, 950M --- GTX 960.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 5 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3080
vs Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
vs Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 2060
vs Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
vs AMD RX 5600-XT

652 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback