Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '19 at 19:28
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 114
54% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 337
35% 282 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 68
Parallax 90.2
53% 74.5 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 55.7
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBN CE2500PNC 250GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 200 210 211 207 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 383
Mixed 248
SusWrite 212
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 50.3
171% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 204
167% 238 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 97%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
925GB free
Firmware: 500.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 93
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 101
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 76%
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.9 9.1 9.1 9.3 8.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 7.7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 9
13% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 8GB
400, 400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 12.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback