Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '19 at 18:43
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700K-$359 359,342 User benchmarks, average bench 86% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	1-Core 128 2-Core 235 87% 182 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 614 65% 508 Pts	64-Core 694 47% 694 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540 554,017 User benchmarks, average bench 103% MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Lighting 363 Reflection 325 Parallax 342 95% 343 fps	MRender 215 Gravity 361 Splatting 228 96% 268 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 114%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 57,613 User benchmarks, average bench 308% 753GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1064 1132 1167 1153 1133 1144 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1,273 Write 1,150 Mixed 1,075 SusWrite 1,132 261% 1,157 MB/s	4K Read 46.2 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 62.9 209% 73 MB/s	DQ Read 996 DQ Write 874 DQ Mixed 926 697% 932 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 359%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$70 209,618 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 112GB free Firmware: 600ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 90 93 103 88 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 262 Write 125 Mixed 177 SusWrite 92.1 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 82.3 4K Mixed 29.4 116% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 93.1 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 104 80% 107 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$59 189,629 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 931GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 124 124 124 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 116 Write 108 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 122 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 32,147 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	86.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 27.6 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 22.4 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 108%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 65%

Battle cruiser

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $97Bench 113%, 414,632 samples	2,212x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 200%, 171,000 samples	1,931x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $55Bench 105%, 518,957 samples	1,907x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $58Bench 84%, 268,353 samples	2,146x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $80Bench 87%, 158,485 samples	1,264x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $75Bench 86%, 103,800 samples	1,185x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $1,521

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24