Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A68HM-K (all builds)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170527
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '19 at 11:03
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-4020 APU 1,315 User benchmarks, average bench 42% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 23.6 2-Core 45.4 33% 45.5 Pts	4-Core 69.6 8-Core 83.4 10% 76.5 Pts	64-Core 70.1 4% 70.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D 8,289 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8526) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.96% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 3.31 Parallax 2.22 2% 2.66 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 2.74 2% 2.21 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.96% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB 3,097 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 90 89 95 99 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 435 Write 354 Mixed 158 SusWrite 109 58% 264 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 6.7 56% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 177 124% 158 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 928GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 171 180 175 179 168 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 138 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 172 95% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.6 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	8.58% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 9.5 Mixed 14 SusWrite 3.3 14% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.1 128% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.58% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273TB0-CK0 1x4GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	79x
Athlon X4 840 Quad CoreAMDBench 45%, 4,588 samples	76x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	58x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	68x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	9x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	115x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	63x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16