Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 200893G (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 200893G
Memory	1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110321
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '16 at 09:43
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core Duo T2600 94 User benchmarks, average bench 33% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	21.9% Poor	Memory 42.7 1-Core 7.1 2-Core 10.9 17% 20.2 Pts	4-Core 8.8 8-Core 11.7 1% 10.2 Pts	64-Core 14.4 1% 14.4 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI MOBILITY FireGL V5200 52 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 2007) 256MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.383.1.1000 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.38 1% 0.74 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHZ2160BH G2 160GB-$80 1,995 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8909 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 199589 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 28966912 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 8044 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8589934592000 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 3844 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 18207 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5793 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 253 253 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 2 (BA) Unknown 253 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 360777252864 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 40 555286559 (BF) G-sense error rate 253 253 16580608 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 17957138 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 102181 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3005 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 455147520 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 2497 (CB) Run out cancel 100 100 433686642409 (F0) Head flying hours 200 200 0	28% Poor	Read 49.7 Write 47.5 Mixed 45.9 36% 47.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.25 65% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.18% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 2.6 6% 2.23 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.18% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $278	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400

Lenovo 200893G

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)