Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1670
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '20 at 16:35
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 49.2
41% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 48.3
8-Core 41.5
6% 44.9 Pts
64-Core 47.4
3% 47.4 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450M
HP(103C 166C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.882.2.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.14% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 2.22
2% 2.65 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.22 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.14%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aps-sl3n -120 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 204 78 78 77 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 441
Write 165
Mixed 353
SusWrite 131
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 23.4
92% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 135
102% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 82%
Fujitsu MHZ2160BH G2 160GB-$80
126GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 58 60 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 46.8
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 58.5
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 666 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback