Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME OMEGA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME OMEGA  (all builds)
Memory122.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '19 at 17:44
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980XE-$1,097
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 76.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 229
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 942
82% 702 Pts
64-Core 2,829
175% 2,829 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37BB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
143% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 210
Parallax 265
153% 221 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 211
Splatting 137
153% 195 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 143%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
712GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1831 1988 1136 1138 1131 1119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,018
Write 1,901
Mixed 1,371
SusWrite 1,391
375% 1,670 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 75.4
240% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 790
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 760
567% 753 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 274%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
869GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2042 2076 1224 1151 1154 1159 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,016
Write 1,967
Mixed 1,429
SusWrite 1,468
386% 1,720 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 83.6
271% 96.4 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 786
593% 795 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 291%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474
2TB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 457 437 446 447 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 435
Mixed 400
SusWrite 442
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 48.8
161% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 112%
Great: 131%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474
2TB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 455 444 443 445 444 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 433
Mixed 411
SusWrite 446
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 48.2
171% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 115%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 53
MC Mixed 35.1
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 10.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME OMEGA Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME OMEGA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,858
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback