Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '19 at 17:18
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 100 2-Core 192 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 454 48% 385 Pts	64-Core 495 31% 495 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 435.27 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.5% Poor	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 31 Parallax 41.8 32% 37.5 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 0.13 18% 25.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105 6,748 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 451GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 294 299 297 291 296 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 461 Write 423 Mixed 245 SusWrite 299 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 35.8 120% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 206 186% 283 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 108%
Hua722020ala330 59Y5485 59Y1795IBM 2TB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 415GB free Firmware: JKAOA34H SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 91 94 93 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 84 Write 80.5 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 92.5 55% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 71%
HITACHI HUA723020ALA640 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 627GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 27 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.1% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 26 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 27.5 38% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston HP698650-154-HYAG M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston HP698650-154-HYAG 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.8% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 13.8 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 13.1 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,926x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	727x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	490x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	65x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	57x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16