Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Provence-5R1
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 09:16
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 214
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 596
63% 505 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.04% Terrible
Lighting 7.43
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 7
6% 15 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 14
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.04%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001c01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 508 514 171 153 145 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,087
Write 543
Mixed 547
SusWrite 261
135% 610 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 54.2
207% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 291
241% 336 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 139%
Great: 197%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: LDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 126 129 127 130 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 87
Write 119
Mixed 55
SusWrite 126
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 859B CB8GS2400.C8ET 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 24.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 7,023 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback