PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T3600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T3600 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170508 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 09 '19 at 19:42 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2665 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
71.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.30
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 428 424 422 424 423 MB/s
|
98%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
309GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 89 82 89 89 MB/s
|
43.6%
Average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
639GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 9.3 15 15 16 16 MB/s
|
4.25%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown-000B NT8GC72B4NG0NK-CG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,062x |
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 446x |
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples | 238x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 162x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 138x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 117x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |