HP HPE-310nl

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP HPE-310nl (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '19 at 19:07
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	68% Good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 146 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 357 37% 296 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 33.5 Reflection 24.8 Parallax 30.7 27% 29.6 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 32.4 Splatting 31.7 28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209 7,834 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: LH6i SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 155 157 153 161 154 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.6% Average	Read 207 Write 179 Mixed 188 SusWrite 151 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 19.9 72% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 129 110% 162 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 82%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 66GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 122 122 126 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 108 Write 29.2 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 124 62% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 265GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 116 114 116 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 119 Write 70.7 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 115 67% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 88%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB 1,821 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 348GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 31 Write 24.5 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 24.2 34% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 39%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB 16,483 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 495GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 27 Write 19.5 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 20.6 29% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
AD80AD80 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 CE80CE80 M378B5173CB0-CK0 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.3% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 10.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 11.1 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP HPE-310nl

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)