Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '19 at 07:03
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 209 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 398 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48% Average	Lighting 44.9 Reflection 93.9 Parallax 101 37% 79.9 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 93.3 Splatting 68.2 70% 88.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS2754D117-514 240GB 381 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS211101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 143 103 101 103 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 483 Write 297 Mixed 279 SusWrite 138 66% 299 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 30.2 102% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 20.9 86% 190 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 315GB free Firmware: CC4H SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 130 126 124 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 139 Write 112 Mixed 83.4 SusWrite 126 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 40,596 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.5% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	89x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	75x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 12,350 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $368

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16