Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120816
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 12 '22 at 17:35
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 182
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 286
34% 261 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 56.4
Parallax 66.3
41% 57.8 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 51.2
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 384 401 441 436 432 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 393
Write 419
Mixed 336
SusWrite 396
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 31.9
108% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 265
201% 273 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
252GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 88 88 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 66.1
Write 66.6
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 89.1
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback