Asrock H67M-GE/HT

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H67M-GE/HT (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120427
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '16 at 16:38
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 83.7 1-Core 72.2 2-Core 123 58% 92.9 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 220 28% 209 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.9% Above average	Lighting 64.2 Reflection 63.9 Parallax 56.9 52% 61.7 fps	MRender 68.9 Gravity 59.3 Splatting 51.8 48% 60 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 775GB free Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1258 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 167 (A5) Unknown 100 100 2031639 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 27 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1005 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 65 279174184996 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 25769803782 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 391 (EA) Unknown 100 100 476 (F1) Unknown 253 253 439 (F2) Unknown 253 253 680 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	78.1% Very good	Read 499 Write 405 Mixed 386 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 20.5 96% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 41.8 52% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3584 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 410 (B1) Unknown 98 98 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 46 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8959088060	87.8% Excellent	Read 503 Write 404 Mixed 416 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 29.6 114% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 74.4 86% 149 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA20N Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 96 96 524288 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 103 (03) Spinup time 117 117 51579847272 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 12985 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 15 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 40 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15113 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2131 (C0) Power-off retract count 90 90 13123 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 13123 (C2) HDA temperature 117 117 283469021235 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 15 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	112% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 200 Mixed 183 144% 191 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 2.75 4K Mixed 0.63 162% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA20N Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 107 (03) Spinup time 119 119 51579519585 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 13112 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 40 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15118 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2131 (C0) Power-off retract count 89 89 13240 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 13240 (C2) HDA temperature 109 109 292058890295 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	114% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 199 Mixed 187 146% 195 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 2.71 4K Mixed 0.57 152% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 991770 4x4GB 220 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.4 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 12.6 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M-GE/HT Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H67M-GE/HT

CPU
Core i5-2390TIntelBench 58%, 894 samples	3x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	3x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)Intel $15Bench 2%, 6,831 samples	2x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
BX100 250GBCrucial $141Bench 87%, 42,930 samples	2x
PX-256M7VC 256GBPlextorBench 84%, 1,046 samples	2x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0707 HU564404EP0200 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0707 HU564404EP0200 16GBUnknownBench 56%, 2 samples	2x
FLFE85F-B8MH9 04CD F3-10666CL9-2GBECO 8325 FLFE85F-B8MH9 04CD F3-10666CL9-2GBECO 8GBUnknownBench 49%, 2 samples	2x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $97

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16