Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za) 3,595 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	24.6% Poor	Memory 43.2 1-Core 19.1 2-Core 38.4 23% 33.6 Pts	4-Core 37 8-Core 40 5% 38.5 Pts	64-Core 37.6 2% 37.6 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340 3,203 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21FD) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 1.33 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BA100G3T 100GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5DV1DL05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 112 138 149 175 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 115 Write 152 Mixed 104 SusWrite 132 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 1.2 17% 6.3 MB/s	DQ Read 72 DQ Write 74.6 DQ Mixed 87.4 62% 78 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 28GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 18 28 32 29 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 51.4 Write 52.4 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 24 50% 39 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.3 78% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16 2x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.6% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 4.6 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 2.7 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16