Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	86.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161019
Uptime	6.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '19 at 23:00
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 94.4 1-Core 153 2-Core 308 101% 185 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 846 81% 670 Pts	64-Core 848 52% 848 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 118 Parallax 109 88% 112 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 102 Splatting 106 84% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 111 92 72 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 318 Write 157 Mixed 206 SusWrite 92.9 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 24 88% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 90.6 DQ Write 55.1 DQ Mixed 63.9 50% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 480GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 95GB free Firmware: R0423A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 12 10 204 14 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 470 Write 408 Mixed 20 SusWrite 118 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 0.7 36% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 10.6 DQ Mixed 0.7 16% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 90%
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160 11,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 29GB free Firmware: MU02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 175 79 76 73 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 269 Write 424 Mixed 368 SusWrite 146 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 48.5 166% 61.4 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 243 204% 295 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 110GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 147 156 155 156 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 124 Write 127 Mixed 15 SusWrite 154 75% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 108%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 40 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 36.2 Write 36.5 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 40.3 26% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.5 168% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 65%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB 2,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 411GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Read 41.5 Write 40.5 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 40.4 52% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 43%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 680GB free, PID 70f5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 43 43 43 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 42.2 Write 34.2 Mixed 34.8 SusWrite 41.6 52% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 2x8GB 1,410 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2197 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 20.6 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 24.1 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 58.8 68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,001x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	253x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $1,128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16