Today's hottest deals

MSI P43T-C51 (MS-7519)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7519
MotherboardMSI P43T-C51 (MS-7519)  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100107
Uptime77.5 Days
Run DateJul 24 '19 at 15:40
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 61.3
35% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 102
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 96.2
6% 96.2 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Asus(1043 827C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.54
Parallax 1.91
5% 5.41 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.96
5% 6.22 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.3 13 11 10 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Read 4.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 11.4
5% 6.25 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 74%
SanDisk Cruzer 2GB
1GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.7 6.2 6.6 6.7 6.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 6
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.5
10% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.6
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P43T-C51 (MS-7519) Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI P43T-C51 (MS-7519)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback