Today's hottest deals

Asrock G41M-VS3.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock G41M-VS3.  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 09:09
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 42.7
1-Core 31.9
2-Core 64
29% 46.2 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 127
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.4
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 175 176 182 181 173 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25% Poor
Read 105
Write 88.5
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 176
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 10.3
29% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 10.6
DQ Write 21.1
DQ Mixed 17.1
13% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41M-VS3. Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G41M-VS3.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback