QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory7.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.02GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5 GB free of 7.02344 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '19 at 19:04
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge, IBRS update)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 104
47% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 341
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 69GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 326 313 205 205 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 606
Write 513
Mixed 520
SusWrite 269
107% 477 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 13.8
48% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 36.7
DQ Write 35.2
DQ Mixed 36.8
27% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x7GB
1 of 1 slots used
7GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback