Empty empty

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
MotherboardTYAN S7012
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 14:03
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 131
59% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 386
39% 316 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 90GB-$242
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 77 75 76 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 129
Write 82.8
Mixed 107
SusWrite 73.5
22% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 22
72% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 85.3
DQ Mixed 27.3
29% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 56%
HP DG072BAAJA 73GB
68GB free
Firmware: HPDB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 41 42 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
Read 81.5
Write 40.8
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 41.5
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 35%
Seagate ST1200MM0158 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: E002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.1 44 2 1.2 3.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.9% Good
Read 222
Write 209
Mixed 103
SusWrite 9
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 2.6
476% 3.23 MB/s
HP DG072BAAJA 73GB
68GB free
Firmware: HPDB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
Read 86.2
Write 42.2
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 42.8
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
169% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 16GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback