| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130814 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 06 '19 at 06:45 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
49%
Average
|
50% 81.6 Pts
|
23% 174 Pts
|
12% 189 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
13% 17.2 fps
|
16% 19.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 111 126 141 156 144 MB/s
|
81.8%
Excellent
|
79% 110 MB/s
|
122% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
254GB free
Firmware: MS1OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 158 159 164 161 160 MB/s
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
84% 117 MB/s
|
150% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patriot PSD34G1600L81 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28%
Poor
|
28% 9.83 GB/s
|
18% 6.33 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-F2A55M-S1 Builds (Compare 54 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-S1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X4 740KAMDBench 49%, 4,318 samples | 12x |
| A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples | 10x |
| A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples | 7x |
| Radeon R7 250AMDBench 9%, 5,461 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |