Asrock B85M-HDS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B85M-HDS (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131206
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '19 at 14:16
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$128 81,111 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 73.8 1-Core 27.9 2-Core 50.3 37% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 77.6 8-Core 80.4 10% 79 Pts	64-Core 80.9 5% 80.9 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2872) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 21.7 Parallax 31 15% 23.8 fps	MRender 33.4 Gravity 29.4 Splatting 24.6 23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 134 130 132 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 122 Write 151 Mixed 81 SusWrite 119 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 112%
WD WD4003FFBX-68MU3 4TB 1,388 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 3.5TB free Firmware: 83.00A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 142 150 149 148 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 173 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 148 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 1.5 328% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 138%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-123.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 7.9 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 4.2 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 92.9 43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-HDS Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M-HDS - $88

CPU
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	62x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	37x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	37x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	9x

RAM
Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 5,025 samples	12x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $331

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16