Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110823
Uptime	16 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 65.4 2-Core 105 54% 84.4 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 350 35% 286 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro FX 570 1,354 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0474) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 0.16 1% 0.91 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 1%
ATI FirePro V7800 (FireGL) Graphics Adapter 136 User benchmarks, average bench 15% AMD(1002 0306) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.9 Reflection 11.4 Parallax 18.3 15% 16.2 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 15.5 Splatting 15.5 12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 256 237 238 233 230 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 454 Write 412 Mixed 363 SusWrite 266 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 60.8 4K Mixed 40.8 133% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 198 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 134%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 136GB free Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 84 85 96 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 82.5 Write 81.8 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 87.4 57% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 15 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	74x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	50x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	14x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	161x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	66x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $516

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16