Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20140102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '19 at 17:49
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 107
53% 84.7 Pts
4-Core 98.6
8-Core 120
14% 110 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 756MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3412
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 2.93
Reflection 3.85
Parallax 3.31
2% 3.36 fps
MRender 3.24
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.04
2% 2.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 31 33 38 25 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 8.5
Write 8.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 28.7
11% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT25664BA160B.C8FE 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 3.2
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback