Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264 13,678 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	60% Good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 84.8 2-Core 176 65% 112 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 253 34% 254 Pts	64-Core 251 16% 251 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 501E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.14% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 7.27 Parallax 7.09 4% 6.21 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 8.61 5% 6.39 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.14% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Faspeed K6-120G 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0803B5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 69 53 54 53 53 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.9% Average	Read 366 Write 270 Mixed 280 SusWrite 89.7 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 14.2 47% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 113 110% 177 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 25,458 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	54.9% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 18 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	4x

SSD
P4-120 120GBBench 63%, 1,681 samples	1x
128GB 128GBXstarBench 59%, 342 samples	1x
TS120GSSD220S 120GBTranscendBench 70%, 8,401 samples	1x

RAM
CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GBCrucialBench 26%, 4,731 samples	1x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	1x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	1x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $39

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16