Today's hottest deals

HP G62 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP G62 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 143A
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111109
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 22:27
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 52.8
1-Core 61
2-Core 108
44% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 157
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 107 24 16 69 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.3% Poor
Read 217
Write 102
Mixed 140
SusWrite 71
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 10.2
40% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 100%
General UDisk 1GB
1GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Read 19.6
Write 12.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 13.7
16% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 7%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
381GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 25.3
Write 18.4
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 17.8
26% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G62 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP G62 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback