Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory30.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 20:47
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
64% Good
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 188
68% 143 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 691
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 895
60% 895 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 0541) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 30.9
7% 26.5 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 26.7
7% 23.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$71
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1455 396 398 399 398 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,054
Write 1,903
Mixed 1,414
SusWrite 574
332% 1,486 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 55.4
202% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 764
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 715
536% 715 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 211%
Great: 290%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$55
802GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 135 136 135 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 167
Write 138
Mixed 74
SusWrite 134
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 115%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$19
98GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 74.8
Write 76.8
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 76.1
47% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 33.6
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 1,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $237
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $199
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback