Beckhoff CX5140-0155

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemBeckhoff CX5140-0155  (all builds)
MotherboardBeckhoff CX51x0
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '19 at 23:03
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom E3845
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 18.2
2-Core 36.3
29% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 72.5
8-Core 72.7
10% 72.6 Pts
64-Core 72.3
4% 72.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.81
Parallax 0.69
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ADATA_ICFS314-030GK 30GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L170317e
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 216 168 128 127 111 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
Read 247
Write 218
Mixed 221
SusWrite 161
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 11.8
56% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 61
DQ Write 11.9
DQ Mixed 14.2
16% 29 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 21.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 14.9
28% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
73% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2G-08-10-12-1333 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 10
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CX5140-0155 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Beckhoff CX5140-0155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback