Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory30.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 10:41
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 696
62% 528 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 0541) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.66% Terrible
Lighting 7.57
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 9.16
6% 8.65 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.66%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1487 398 398 399 399 399 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,075
Write 1,931
Mixed 1,433
SusWrite 580
336% 1,505 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 75.1
282% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 960
DQ Write 784
DQ Mixed 868
651% 871 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 244%
Great: 280%
MT-256 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: T170810a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 458 413 353 318 342 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 478
Write 388
Mixed 384
SusWrite 392
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 27.1
108% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 111
110% 170 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
796GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 135 134 134 134 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 110
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 133
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
73GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 64
Write 65.5
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 67.5
41% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ KRE-D3U1600M/ 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 33.9
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback