Zoostorm 7200-5305B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZoostorm 7200-5305B  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-R
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateSep 09 '19 at 21:52
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$77
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 182
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 343
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.6% Good
Lighting 76
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 63.6
62% 71.1 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 70
Splatting 72.4
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$25
182GB free
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 385 406 426 193 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 392
Write 418
Mixed 360
SusWrite 319
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 37.8
138% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 190
166% 244 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
782GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 131 161 168 161 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 171
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 152
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB
4GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.2 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 23
Write 6
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 6.2
11% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.4
159% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11%
Great: 13%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
454GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 115 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 112
Write 111
Mixed 38
SusWrite 115
125% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5305B Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Zoostorm 7200-5305B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $293
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback