Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1299c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP p7-1299c  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory5.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130904
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 13:37
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 111
54% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 180
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 375B) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 5.07
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 4.84
4% 4.79 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 5.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 180GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 148 148 150 150 159 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.1% Good
Read 276
Write 199
Mixed 218
SusWrite 151
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 29.2
104% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 126
119% 187 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1299c Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP p7-1299c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback