Samsung RV415/RV515

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung RV415/RV515  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV415/RV415
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 18:16
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 18.7
2-Core 35.8
28% 38 Pts
4-Core 34.4
8-Core 30
4% 32.2 Pts
64-Core 34.6
2% 34.6 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Sanyo(144D C589) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.38 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 66 65 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 12
Write 63.1
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 64.5
33% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 47%
Multiple Card Reader 0GB
0GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
1.4% Terrible
Read 5.2
Write 0.8
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 0.9
2% 2.15 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.4%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JSF12864HZ-1G1F1 Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 3GB
1066, 1333 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 1.4
5% 1.6 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV415/RV515 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV415/RV515

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback