Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba Qosmio F50

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba Qosmio F50 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA JSKAA
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '16 at 22:23
Run Duration	98 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9800-$75 537 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 82.9 44% 66.4 Pts	4-Core 83.3 8-Core 83 11% 83.2 Pts	64-Core 83.3 5% 83.3 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9700M GTS 174 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FF00) 512MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.17.12.5947 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 6.54 Parallax 1.19 3% 3.8 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.7 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55 6,982 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: PC3ZC70F Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 118 118 3284 (03) Spinup time 171 171 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2537 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 9513 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2528 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 874840095 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 36488 (C2) HDA temperature 152 152 214749020196 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	51.8% Above average	Read 89.6 Write 90.9 Mixed 12.7 46% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.31 72% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio F50 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio F50

CPU
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 9600M-GTNvidiaBench 2%, 3,959 samples	2x

SSD
Q Series Pro 128GBToshiba $66Bench 82%, 2,808 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $121

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400