Medion ERAZER X5317 I/C041

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medion ERAZER X5317 I/C041 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151111
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '19 at 09:52
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 126 2-Core 246 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 706 67% 553 Pts	64-Core 690 43% 690 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 133 Reflection 145 Parallax 124 108% 134 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 134 Splatting 108 96% 119 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GB 467 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 335GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 366 447 466 472 471 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 432 Mixed 280 SusWrite 427 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 46 174% 66 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 281 230% 330 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 119%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 30GB free, PID 0157 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 35.2 Write 35 Mixed 33 SusWrite 38 48% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 3.9 251% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125 59,072 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 24.3 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 23.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X5317 I/C041 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 71%

Battleship

System: Medion ERAZER X5317 I/C041

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	2x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 98%, 467 samples	3x
MX500 2TBCrucial $155Bench 108%, 44,787 samples	1x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	3x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	1x
BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBR2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1315 BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBR2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GBUnknownBench 67%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $375

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16