HP Pro 3000 Microtower PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP Pro 3000 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR 3664h
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 17:46
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$270
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
31.9% Below average
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 102
36% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 194
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 201
14% 201 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Zotac(19DA 2292) 1GB
CLim: 1033 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 44.6
Parallax 83
16% 61.8 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 71.1
Splatting 38.9
18% 53.5 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 17%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 732GB
681GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 35 37 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.6% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 125
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 40
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 76%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 268GB
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 23 33 34 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 178
Write 132
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 34.3
67% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 199%
Multiple Card Reader 8GB
3GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8.4 7.4 7.7 7.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 7.5
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 8
14% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
70% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown RMR1870EF48E8W1333 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 GU512303EP0202 99U5471-011.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.3% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Pro 3000 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Pro 3000 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $138Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210AMD RX 5700 $370Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340AMD RX 590 $186Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback