Ciara 1.5x18-X6 CACHEH 10G

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Ciara 1.5x18-X6 CACHEH 10G (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn CangJie
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140812
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '19 at 17:26
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 1,918 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 110 2-Core 203 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 337 8-Core 475 51% 406 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3415) CLim: 1291 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Lighting 65.4 Reflection 66.9 Parallax 83.3 53% 71.8 fps	MRender 64.6 Gravity 66.3 Splatting 55.7 50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_5100_MTFDDAK480TBY 480GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: D0MU037 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 225 223 230 229 227 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.8% Good	Read 235 Write 223 Mixed 189 SusWrite 225 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 25.8 98% 36.1 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 179 133% 175 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 98%
Toshiba AL13SEB900 900GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 585GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 167 165 170 170 173 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 156 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 170 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.2 237% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 98%
Toshiba AL13SEB900 900GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 548GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 154 158 159 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 149 Write 152 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 158 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.3 250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 98%
Toshiba AL13SEB900 900GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 495GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 159 161 164 160 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 155 Mixed 80 SusWrite 160 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.2 250% 2 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 98%
Toshiba AL13SEB900 900GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 792GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 178 170 172 176 171 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 164 Mixed 84.2 SusWrite 173 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 1.3 263% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB 1x8GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	30.6% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.6 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Ciara 1.5x18-X6 CACHEH 10G

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)