Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime13.8 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 18:51
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 162
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 312
39% 296 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1494) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.05 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST31000424CS 1TB
891GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 70 90 87 91 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 84.7
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 62%
Samsung G2 Portable 500GB
320GB free, PID 6033
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 30
Write 19.2
Mixed 23
SusWrite 24.6
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback