Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 3,274 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 76.9 2-Core 152 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 449 44% 359 Pts	64-Core 556 34% 556 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000D 684 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0914) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 354.56 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	5.63% Terrible	Lighting 7.57 Reflection 8.96 Parallax 2.56 6% 6.36 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 8.1 Splatting 0.13 5% 6.43 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.63% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUC156060CSS200 600GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: a102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 178 173 170 178 174 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 213 Write 212 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 176 128% 175 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.4 323% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 134%
Hitachi HUC103030CSS600 300GB 52GB free Firmware: a530 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 90 89 88 92 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49% Average	Read 80.1 Write 85.1 Mixed 46.1 SusWrite 90.2 55% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 205% 1.43 MB/s

Hitachi HUH728080AL 8TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 5TB free Firmware: T907 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 173 188 185 180 184 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 148 Write 148 Mixed 79.6 SusWrite 183 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.7 230% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 113%
Hitachi HUH728080AL 8TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 5TB free Firmware: T907 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 185 175 175 184 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 165 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 181 106% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 218% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1 3x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 3 of 16 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.9% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 24 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 9.6 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 01stBench 54%, 930 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
Quadro K420NvidiaBench 3%, 3,707 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	1x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70DB0- 64GBSamsungBench 62%, 3 samples	2x
M393B5273DH0- 16x4GBSamsungBench 79%, 2 samples	1x
HMT42GR7AFR4C Samsung M393B2G70DB0- HMT42GR7AFR4C Samsung M393B2G70DB0- HMT42GR7AFR4C Samsung M393B2G70DB0- HMT42GR7AFR4C Samsung M393B2G70DB0- ... 256GBHynixBench 93%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $197

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16