Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime4 Days
Run DateOct 01 '19 at 07:24
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 195
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 600
54% 455 Pts
64-Core 573
35% 573 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 26.8
16% 21.5 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 21
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN11SM18EG240GB 240GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 59 28 65 76 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 472
Write 423
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 93.4
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.2
17% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 92%
External USB 3.0 1TB
859GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 40
Write 36
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 37.5
26% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 24.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 19.2
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback