Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 95.7 2-Core 200 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 484 52% 414 Pts	64-Core 500 31% 500 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 83AC) 1GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 23.4 Parallax 18 16% 20.5 fps	MRender 27 Gravity 20.5 Splatting 21.6 19% 23 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 18%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB 2,338 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9C08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 310 321 329 317 331 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 408 Write 315 Mixed 266 SusWrite 320 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 24.5 90% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 207 184% 277 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 1x8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 8.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	498x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	129x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	58x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 89%, 207 samples	56x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373