Average Bench: 10.5% (233rd of 620)

Based on 5,205 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0FFE Model: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro K2000 averaged 89.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 30.4fps
Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 26.8fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro K2000 is just 1.3%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro K2000 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 21.7fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 26.3fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 5,205 samples)
Min Avg Max
24.7 Lighting 26.8 28
20.3 Reflection 21.7 22.1
29.5 Parallax 32.8 34.1
8.93% 27.1 fps
Min Avg Max
24.6 MRender 25.3 25.6
25 Gravity 30.4 33
25.4 Splatting 26.3 27.2
11.6% 27.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 1314 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.2
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 43.4
12% 36.7 fps
MRender 31.9
Gravity 44.4
Splatting 36.5
16% 37.6 fps
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 22
Parallax 33.5
9% 27.7 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 33
Splatting 27
12% 28.5 fps
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 22
Parallax 33.5
9% 27.7 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 27.1
12% 28.5 fps
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 33.4
9% 27.6 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 27.2
12% 28.5 fps
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 33.4
9% 27.5 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 27
12% 28.3 fps
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Lighting 26.9
Reflection 22
Parallax 33.6
9% 27.5 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 26.9
12% 28 fps
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 19.4
Parallax 34
6% 22.3 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 25.3
11% 26.3 fps
5,205 MORE »

 Game FPS Estimates

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 18,447,804 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 5,205 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 53% 10% ± 1%
HP(103C 094C) 47% 10% ± 1%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro K2000 Builds (Compare 5,988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $345

Popular Quadro K2000 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible

16 months ago.

It does the games bad lol lmao xd


Your
opinion?
620 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback