Average Bench: 7.28% (349th of 714)

Based on 13,526 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 0FFE Model: NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia Quadro K2000 averaged 92.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 8.15fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 9.54fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro K2000 is just 0.53%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro K2000 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 10.5fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 10.5fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 13,526 samples)
Min Avg Max
7.7 Lighting 8.15 8.6
9.6 Reflection 10.5 11.4
9.8 Parallax 10.5 11.3
6.63% 9.72 fps
Min Avg Max
11.5 MRender 11.9 12.2
8.3 Gravity 10.2 10.9
9.2 Splatting 9.54 9.7
8.53% 10.5 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 10.2
7% 9.7 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 9.6
8% 10 fps
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 10.2
7% 9.67 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 9.6
8% 10 fps
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 10.2
7% 9.67 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 9.5
8% 9.97 fps
HP(103C 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 10.2
7% 9.63 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 9.4
8% 9.83 fps
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 10.6
6% 9.57 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 9.6
9% 10.8 fps
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 10
6% 8.97 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 8.5
8% 9.63 fps
13,526 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,456,021 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 13,526 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
HP(103C 094C) 54% 7% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 46% 7% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro K2000 Builds (Compare 5,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373

Popular Quadro K2000 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

9 months ago.

It does the games bad lol lmao xd


Good

3 months ago.

Slow on Render Videos/Plating and basic games (using 3D Render without RTX, be like a Minecraft)


Good

2 years ago.

it's okay, for some games that is. for my first GPU which I stole from an old dell precision, it's better than inter-integrated graphics but don't go buying it for a gaming card since its an older Quadro and only runs games well at 1366x768


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback