Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88 21,890 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 67.4 2-Core 122 56% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 194 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D 8,328 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8526) 768MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.01% Terrible	Lighting 6.17 Reflection 8.77 Parallax 5.78 5% 6.91 fps	MRender 4.48 Gravity 4.97 Splatting 7.96 5% 5.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2166 Write 37.5 Mixed 75.4 158% 760 MB/s	4K Read 332 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 4.9 511% 113 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 9905584-014.A00LF 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1600, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.8% Below average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 11 32% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 11 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	3x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	2x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 12GBSamsungBench 31%, 6 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 2000 C10 4x2GBCorsairBench 54%, 81 samples	2x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16